Which statement best reflects about practice length and duration?

The selected statement emphasizes the importance of balancing practice duration and frequency with skill development and fatigue management. Short and frequent practice sessions are often more effective for skill retention and improvement, particularly if the skills being practiced can lead to fatigue. This approach allows athletes to maintain focus and engagement, reducing the risks of burnout and injuries that can arise from lengthy, infrequent practices.

Athletes are more likely to perform better when they are not overwhelmed or exhausted, so breaking practice into shorter segments allows for recovery and better skill acquisition. This strategy aligns with findings in sports science that suggest spaced repetition and shorter, more intense periods of practice lead to better long-term retention of skills and knowledge.

In contrast, longer and infrequent practice sessions might lead to fatigue, decreased motivation, and diminished focus, which can negatively impact performance. The notion that duration is irrelevant to performance disregards the significant impact that practice structure has on learning and execution, while suggesting that practice should always be extensive overlooks the importance of quality over quantity in training sessions.