What factors should determine the decision to use a whole, combined, or part approach when teaching a skill?

The decision to use a whole, combined, or part approach when teaching a skill is primarily informed by the interdependence and complexity of the skill being taught. Interdependence refers to how various components of a skill rely on each other. For example, if a skill requires several movements that must be synchronized, it may be more effective to teach it as a whole rather than breaking it down into parts.

Complexity involves the difficulty and number of components that comprise the skill. Skills that are complex and have many intricate parts may benefit from a breakdown into simpler components for easier learning. In contrast, simpler skills may be best taught in their entirety to preserve the fluidity and timing required.

By analyzing interdependence and complexity, instructors can tailor their teaching methods to maximize skill acquisition, ensuring that learners can effectively understand and perform the skill in different contexts. This approach fosters a better learning experience and helps athletes develop proficiency in their relevant skills.